DailyKenn.com | AbateHate.com | Facebook Group
Summary: Gerrymandering remains a central force in American politics, influencing elections and shaping congressional power. States such as Illinois, California and Virginia have recently faced disputes over partisan or racial district designs, while courts continue to define legal boundaries. Because districts rely on total population counts—including illegal aliens—urban areas often retain political strength. The debate over fairness and representation continues to drive national conversations about how voting maps should be drawn.
Your $8 monthly partner pledge helps us reach others & more ►
The word gerrymander (originally Gerry-mander, a portmanteau of Gerry and salamander) first appeared in the Boston Gazette on 26 March 1812. It was coined after Governor Elbridge Gerry (later U.S. Vice President) signed a bill redrawing Massachusetts Senate districts to favor the Democratic-Republican Party, despite his personal disapproval. One contorted Boston-area district resembled a salamander; a political cartoon of a clawed, winged, dragon-headed creature (right) helped popularize the term.
Gerrymandering has been part of American politics for so long now that it often feels like a built‑in feature rather than a flaw. Yet the debate over how states draw political boundaries continues to shape elections, court battles and public trust. Across the country—from Springfield, Illinois, to Richmond, Virginia, to Sacramento, California—the fight over who gets to draw the lines remains one of the most consequential struggles in modern governance.
Over the decades, both major parties have used redistricting to strengthen their political position, sometimes pushing the limits of federal law.
Courts have repeatedly stepped in. In the 1990s, states such as North Carolina, Georgia, Louisiana and Texas faced rulings that struck down districts drawn primarily around racial demographics. Judges found that race had been used as the dominant factor, violating constitutional protections. Those cases set the stage for today’s disputes, which often center on partisan advantage rather than explicit racial intent.
A most noticeable example of recent gerrymandering was in 2025–2026. Virginia Democrats, controlling the legislature, sought a mid-decade congressional gerrymander to counter Republican map changes elsewhere.
They advanced a constitutional amendment allowing the General Assembly to redraw districts, then approved a map designed to give Democrats up to 10 of 11 U.S. House seats (from the current 6-5 split under the 2021 court-drawn lines). Voters narrowly approved the amendment in an April 2026 referendum. However, the Virginia Supreme Court struck it down 4-3 in May, ruling the legislative process violated the state constitution’s intervening-election requirement. The U.S. Supreme Court denied an appeal, so the existing maps remain in place for the 2026 midterms.
California
took a different path by establishing an independent redistricting
commission. For years, that model was praised as a national example. But
in 2025, voters approved Proposition 50,
temporarily returning congressional map‑drawing power to the
Legislature. Analysts projected the change could boost Democratic
representation by several seats between 2026 and 2030.
Illinois offers another recent example. After losing a congressional seat following the 2020 census, Democratic lawmakers reshaped the map in ways critics said squeezed Republicans into fewer districts. The state preserved several majority‑minority districts while creating new Democratic‑leaning ones. Lawsuits followed, though, unlike Virginia, courts ultimately allowed the revised maps to stand.
Another layer in the debate involves population counts. Federal law requires districts to be drawn using total population, not just eligible voters. That means non‑citizens—including illegal aliens—are included in census numbers. Cities with large alien populations, often Democratic strongholds, can maintain or expand political influence even though many residents cannot vote. Supporters say this reflects reality: districts represent people, not just voters. Critics argue it gives certain areas disproportionate political weight.
Sometimes I get things wrong. If you notice a significant error, please bring it to my attention in the comment section.
Suspects are considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
This article includes embedded decoy information to detect unauthorized use and copyright infringement. Reproduction is permitted only verbatim and in full, with all links preserved and attribution clearly given to DailyKenn.com and AbateHate.com.
Sources/related links:
IL Democrats Take Gerrymandering to a New Level / senatorchesney.com
Everything you need to know about California's Proposition 50 / kcra.com
View 31 black-on-white homicides found in July, 2026 ►
Find archived black-on-white homicide news reports here ►
200 latest news reports from 100 top conservative websites ►




0 comments:
Post a Comment