DailyKenn.com — THIS PRESENTATION COVERS various topics including commentary on Jimmy Kimmel's remarks about Donald Trump, criticisms of late-night talk show hosts, discussions on racism, observations on societal issues, and opinions on political matters. Key points include:
Kimmel's commentary on Trump's statements about immigration and "nice countries" is criticized as racially biased.
Late-night hosts Jimmy Kimmel, Jimmy Fallon, and Stephen Colbert are all criticized for being white males, with the suggestion that they should quit their jobs for diversity's sake.
The text discusses the racial demographics of wealthy neighborhoods like Malibu, California, and questions the motivations behind renaming landmarks after social justice activists.
The concept of gaslighting is introduced, suggesting that discussions of white privilege and racism make white people question their non-racist beliefs.
The renaming of landmarks and discussions around a four-day workweek in Great Britain are critiqued for potential racial implications.
There's a discussion about perceptions of racism against white Americans and potential changes to civil rights legislation in a hypothetical second Trump presidency.
Steven Miller's involvement in the conservative nonprofit America First Legal is mentioned, along with criticisms of corporations allegedly discriminating against white males.
Overall, the text expresses skepticism and criticism towards various social and political issues, with a focus on racial dynamics and perceptions of discrimination.
Transcript...
Let's listen to this brief clip of Jimmy Kimmel making his commentary on Donald Trump. It's only about 20 seconds long.
Melania did make a rare appearance alongside her husband at a fundraiser on Saturday night. Trump claims he raked in $50 million Saturday night, which seems high, but he's not one to exaggerate. At the fundraiser, [there's this little light that says "laughter" that comes on when you're supposed to laugh.]
He said he wants immigrants to come from nice countries like Denmark and Switzerland and Norway. Whenever Trump says "nice," he means white. Whatever he says "nice," he means white.
To me, that is a racist statement because what he is doing, in essence, in my opinion (you can disagree with me), is Kimmel is suggesting that white countries are nicer. Traditionally white countries are nice. They're not white as they used to be, but traditionally white countries are nice. But or are reputed to be nice. And so Trump picks up on that. And non-white countries then, by default, are not nice.
Well, let me ask you this: where would you prefer to live? Would you prefer to live in Norway, Sweden, Switzerland? Or would you prefer to live in Iran, Nigeria, South Africa—extremely violent? Or anywhere south of the border—Mexico, Central America—extremely violent? So what he's saying is, just my opinion, is he's kind of admitting that he's sort of a white supremacist. Can we say that, believes in white superiority?
And another thing I've noticed is this: three major networks have, like, late-night talk shows. Who are the presenters? The British call them presenters; in America, we call them hosts. I like presenters better. Well, there's Jimmy Kimmel, Jimmy Fallon, and Stephen Colbert. What do those three individuals have in common? They're all white and they're all males. I know Stephen Colbert is Jewish, but he looks white, so we throw him in. If they've got a problem with racism, I would think that they would quit their jobs in the name of equity and diversity. Equity and what's the D stand for? I don't know. But in the name of diversity, they would give up their jobs so that somebody else who is not white and not male could have them. You know, someone like Oprah should do good with a late-night show, don't you think?
Another thing I noticed about these people making fun of white-majority nations being nice countries: have you ever noticed where celebrities live? How many white celebrities, white leftist celebrities, live in Black housing projects? I mean, they can live wherever they want. They got the money. And if they can't get a place in a Black housing project, they could move into the neighborhood, right? But they don't. I mean, has anyone noticed that Malibu, California, one of the wealthiest communities on the planet, particularly in the country, it's basically all white? You know, Diana Ross lives there. She's not white, but the rest of them are either white or, if you want to include Jews as white or not, then we'll say white and Jewish. Why is that? Well, I don't know. I guess they don't like black people. Maybe.
So there is this term called gaslighting. You're familiar with this, I'm sure. But gaslighting, the victims of gaslighting, are deliberately and systematically fed false information about themselves that make them question what they know to be true, particularly something negative. So when someone talks about white privilege or they impose white guilt, which is normal in Hollywood or which is effectively, in my opinion, what Jimmy Kimmel just did, that's gaslighting. My opinion is that what they're doing is they're making us, deliberately and systematically, they're making us white people question what we know to be true. What we know to be true is we are not racist. But you know the Marxist paradigm, they've got to divide us between the proletariat and the bourgeois class. And so in China, during the Cultural Revolution, it was the intellectual class that was designated as the oppressive bourgeois. But in Western countries, it is white people who are the oppressive bourgeois class. Everyone else is oppressed.
Speaking of which, I don't know if you saw this or not, but the Key Bridge, Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, they want it renamed after a black person because I think Key was a slaveholder and he wrote the national anthem, and there was something in the national anthem that they claim is racist. All right. So what do we take away from this? What we take away from it is they started by banning the Confederate flag and Confederate symbols, Confederate imagery because they're racist. That set the precedent that cracked open the door. Now they're going after anything and everything that represents Western culture. Why do they hate Western culture? Well, Western people tend to be innovative. You know, we invented just about everything. And that doesn't sit well with Marxists because in the Marxist mindset, we're all basically the same. And if there is any difference in economic status, it's got to be due to social oppression. So they have to erase anything that is natural and pretend it's sociological.
So it says here the Caucus of African American Leaders—I didn't know there was such a thing—has unanimously voted to ask that when the Francis Scott Key Bridge is rebuilt, it no longer bear the name of the national anthem's author. I mean, this guy is so evil, you would think that he's a basketball star, you know, a white woman basketball star, college basketball star. The 47-year-old bridge was toppled by a massive cargo ship, you knew that. And the caucus is calling on the governor and the Maryland General Assembly to rename the bridge after United States Senator Representative Pin J. Mitchell. Now what I notice about this is there are a significant number of black people throughout American history who contributed much to this country, business people. But we don't even know who they are because the Oak won't talk about it. When they want to rename something, you know, a street or lamp post or in this case a bridge, they always want to name it after a social justice activist. In this case, it's a person who also happens to be a US Representative. What are they doing? Well, in my opinion, they are destroying our culture.
And then there's this. Did you know the 4-day work week could be racist? I like the way they say "could be." And that is according to a report, and they use the word "suggest." This is from telegraph.co.uk. And if we scroll down here, you know, I read through this whole thing and I was wondering how could a 4-day work week possibly be racist? Well, apparently, the way they reason this is upper management tends to be white, and lower management in the public sector tends to be non-white. This is in Great Britain, this is in Wales, you know, country in Great Britain, one unnamed member (that's a shock) of a group reportedly said that allowing workers to have an extra day off would require them to hire an additional 179 staff on full-time equivalent contracts. So I guess he's saying contracts. Does that mean hiring them or farming out? I don't know. But here is the reason: costs faced by workers having to partake rather in more leisure activities on their additional day off, as well as on the impact of energy bills of having to heat homes during the normally spent time at work. So how is this racist? Well, it's taking this class of people, working-class people who are disproportionately represented by not whites, I guess, and it's forcing them to have more leisure activities. Seems to me that would be a good thing. Apparently, they think it's not.
What's more, they're going to have to heat their homes because they're home. So it's going to run up their electric bill. So here's what I think the angle is. Don't know, they didn't say it, but my guess is what they're going to do is they're going to say, you know, yeah, let's have a 4-day work week, but let's increase their pay so that, you know, because they're having to take leisure time. Most people want leisure time. I don't get that one. And they're going to have to pay more for energy bills because none of these people leave their heat on, I guess when they go to work. How do they know that? Well, you know, this is grasping. It's, you know, they're really, really out of line here.
And then there's this one. Donald Trump. Last year, a survey of more than 1500 people who voted for him in the 2020 election found a significant majority of the former president supporters believe that racism against white Americans has become a bigger problem than racism against black Americans. I disagree with that. I don't think it has become. I think it always has been.
Now with a very real prospect of a second term in the office on the horizon, it said Trump and his team of advisors have begun working on plans to federalize one vector of that inverted interpretation of discrimination. Why is it inverted? I mean, if you discriminate against a class of people, it's discrimination. Doesn't matter. Should voters return Trump to the White House next, the Justice Department will likely dramatically change the government's interpretation of civil rights laws to focus on anti-white racism rather than discrimination against people of color. I doubt it, but that's what they say. How do they know that? And they're just, you know, again, they're just making stuff up.
The point of the matter is, everybody knows that diversity is our strength. So why does this even matter? I mean, if diversity is our strength, and we all know that it is, this should not be an issue.
Now, down here it talks about extremist groups are making plans. Reading the article, I got to wonder when they say extremist groups, are they talking extremist Islamist groups or are they talking extreme left-wing groups? I don't think they acknowledge extremist left-wing groups. Even Antifa or Antifa, if you want to call it that, is not considered an extremist group according to these people because they are extremists, but they think they're normal, in my opinion.
At the forefront of Trump's circles, of the Trump Circle plan to upend civil rights legislation, now they're saying it as if it's fact. Remember in the headline, it was, you know, it's kind of a plan, it's kind of a suggestion, but now they're saying it's a fact. At the forefront of the plan to upend civil rights legislation in favor of white people is Stephen Miller, the former White House adviser, largely responsible for some of the administration's most draconian anti-immigration policies—you know, things like building a wall and making people come into the country legally. Following this time, the Trump administration, in the Trump administration, Miller here's the explanation here, with his long and well-documented history of white nationalist leanings.
Where is it? Okay, they've got links here. Found America First Legal, a conservative nonprofit he describes as the right wing's long awaited answer to the ACLU. The group is primarily notable as a policy harbinger, or harbinger if you prefer, for a second term. The New York Times—what is that, Jimmy Kimmel said sarcastically. You know, they're not biased, are they? Last month added that AFL has already alleged that W corporations like Disney, Nike, Mattel, Hershey, United Airlines, and the National Football League—they left out Kroger's—whatever, discriminate against white males. Okay, well if they do, then they need to be called out on it, you know? I fail to see a problem. What you see is a red dot lower right-hand corner. If you click on that dot, you can subscribe to our YouTube channel, be part of our family. Lower right-hand corner, there is a rectangle. Click on that and you can watch some of our past videos and our commentary. And we'll see you all next...
Find archived black-on-white homicide news reports here ►
200 latest news reports from 100 top conservative websites
0 comments:
Post a Comment