Members of the collective include inventors of the musical instruments Lennon used during the composition phase. Other collective members include those who invented the recording equipment he used as well as audio engineers who recorded his song. The individuals who constructed the building in which Lennon wrote the song played a significant role in its composition. What's more, those who helped manufacture the elements of the building's construction materials, recording equipment, and musical instruments are members of the collective and must be given equal credit for Lennon's composition.
White people invented nothing
Likewise, Steve Jobs was no inventor. Other members of the Apple team were members of the collective that gave us the iPhone. Let's extrapolate: Each member of Jobs' team had their own "teams" of supporters and helpers that would include everyone from the IT department to spouses and extended family members. And on it goes. Each participant of the that second team — or collective — had his or her group of influencers, and the chain continues until the entire human race can get credit for inventing the iPhone.
Henry Ford never could have invented anything without his collective. The same holds true of Thomas Edison and any other inventor you can imagine. Every Western invention was actually the product of a global collective that extends to the beginning of life. We all invented everything, therefore we all own everything.
That fits nicely in the Marxist-collectivist-globalist paradigm, doesn't it?
Summation? Ono's royalty checks belong to all of us.
Collective collaboration transcends inventions
For this "no individual invented anything" mindset to be taken seriously
— and as you can see in the video, some not only take it with grave seriousness, but slap a "neuroscience" label on it for credibility — it must be universally applied.
Name your favorite serial killer then attribute his crimes to those who enabled him; sometimes they were the victims themselves. And who enabled the enablers? And the enablers' enablers? Again the global collective gets credit, so we should all be heading for death row; or a least an extended prison sentence.
So, who really killed John F. Kennedy? The same people who invented the iPhone and wrote Imagine: All of us, collectively.
It's cultural gaslighting
Gaslighting is the denial of another's reality. Conventionally, a gaslighter will attempt to convince his victim that gaslighting target is insane. The gaslighter will simultaneously attempt to convince everyone else his target is insane.
Cultrual gaslighting is the denial of a culture's reality. The gaslighters will attempt to convince their victims that their race or nation is racist. The gaslighter will simultaneously attempt to convince everyone else this targets are racists.
The cultural gaslighter will also attempt to convince a nation their culture has no value. An example of this was an advertisement released by an airline. The short ad belittled Scandavian culture; presented it as worthless with no identity and no cultural history of which to be proud.
Watch the video below. Can you see the gaslighting? It's very obvious.
Why they do this...
Why does Marxism reach outside the realm of reality to embrace such silly dogmas such as believing that race and sex are social constructs, plastic straws are damaging the planet's climate, and no man is an island, but a member of a global collective?
 |
| Gaslighting: Scandinavians are convinced to despise themselves |
Marxism is closely akin to a religion. Call it 'Marxology' or, when blended with Christianity, 'Marxianity.' Marxism comes with its own 'holy book' (Das Kapital), a messiah (Karl Marx), sacred sciences (climate change, race and gender denial), apocalypse (outcome of climate change), and evangelists (the guys in the above video).
Sorry. I'm into reality, not religion.