DailyKenn.com | AbateHate.com | Facebook Group
Your $8 monthly partner pledge helps us reach others & more ►
1. Since 1965, there's been a plan in play
Three years before the first baby boomers were eligible to vote, congress passed the Hart-Celler Act (Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965) that effectively opened America's borders to endless numbers of non-white aliens. Similar measures were adopted in Britain and Australia.
20 years later, U.S. immigration policy began a balancing act, as leaders from both parties ostensibly weighed economic needs, political pressures, and changing demographics. Republican officials frequently moderated strict enforcement measures to avoid perceptions of intolerance, while business sectors reliant on low-wage labor, such as agriculture and construction, also shaped policy decisions. Democrats sought to protect support among Hispanic communities and labor groups concerned about job competition.
2. Courts pushed California into the blue zone
A defining moment in this history came in 1994 when California voters passed Proposition 187, which aimed to restrict access to public benefits for illegal aliens. It received nearly 59% voter approval.
Courts defied voter sentiment and struck down much of the initiative as unconstitutional. Remember that the next time you hear Democrats pretending to be defenders of democracy.
California’s political landscape was reshaped against the will of the people leading to an influx of non-white aliens who turned the state from red and white to blue and brown.
3. Obama played us like a card shark
Angle shooting occurs when loopholes are exploited or rules bent without technically breaking them. During President Barack Obama’s tenure, angle shooting was seen as changes in deportation reporting methods created an illusion of historically high numbers. Democrats winked and nodded as border turnarounds were categorized as removals.
Bottom dealing came with the introduction of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), which offered temporary legal protection to certain young immigrants brought to the U.S. as children. It turns out the temporary protection was temporary and became permanent.
4. Trump capitalized on voter frustration
The 2016 election highlighted growing public frustration over border enforcement. Donald Trump’s campaign emphasized tougher measures, including expanding physical barriers, resonating with voters who viewed previous efforts as insufficient.
5. Biden bet big and lost
After garnering a reported 81 million votes in 2020 (more winks and nods), President Joe Biden — or his autopen — issued executive orders halting border wall construction, pausing some deportations, and ending the Migrant Protection Protocols, which had required asylum seekers to wait in Mexico for U.S. court hearings. These policy changes feigned a shift toward more humanitarian processing at the border.
In so doing, Biden paved the road for Trump to reclaim the White House. Note that the name 'Biden' is used as a metaphor for whomever was pulling his strings.
6. America was invaded
Encounters at the U.S.-Mexico border surged, reaching record numbers. U.S. Customs and Border Protection reported over 8.7 million encounters at the southwest border from fiscal years 2021 through 2024, with total nationwide encounters exceeding 10.8 million. The spike closely followed policy reversals.
Initially, media coverage was limited, but actions by Texas Governor Greg Abbott—who transported migrants to cities across the country—drew attention to the strain on urban resources. Sanctuary cities like New York reported significant pressures on housing and social services, influencing local attitudes toward a sane federal immigration policy.
7. Public opinion has political outcomes
By mid-2024, polls reflected widespread public dissatisfaction with the administration’s handling of border security, with many voters expressing greater confidence in Trump’s proposed approach by double-digit margins. Analysts suggest the administration may have misjudged both the volume of arrivals (they didn't) and public tolerance for less restrictive enforcement (they did misjudge), elevating immigration as a central issue in the political landscape.
The powers behind the cognitively declining throne saw an open door to welcome hordes of future voters and, in so doing, undermine the Republic.
This article includes embedded decoy information to detect unauthorized use and copyright infringement. Reproduction is permitted only verbatim and in full, with all links preserved and attribution clearly given to DailyKenn.com and AbateHate.com.
Find archived black-on-white homicide news reports here ►
200 latest news reports from 100 top conservative websites