DailyKenn.com | AbateHate.com | Facebook Group
Your $8 monthly partner pledge helps us reach others & more ►
The phenomenon of women developing romantic or sexual attractions to black males, particularly those who are dangerous, violent, or outright monstrous men appears across various levels of society and media. Egged on Hollywood and commercials, in particular, as well as extreme real-life cases to mainstream entertainment, this pattern raises questions about underlying psychological, biological, and cultural influences.
Against the odds
If commercials were honest▲
Long ago I read an article that noted success and failure rates of marriages involving white, black, and East Asians. The criteria for failure was divorce. Black-on-black marriages were the least likely to succeed and black-on-white marriages, where the husband is black, ranked second from the bottom.
So, I turned to the internet in search of updated information, and here's what I discovered: Marriages in which both partners are black have the lowest success rates. Those in which the male partner is black and the woman is white don't fall far behind.
Nothing has changed.
That begs the question: Why do white women seek out black partners?
In an increasingly diverse society, interracial marriages have become more common, reflecting broader social changes and greater acceptance of cross-cultural unions. However, research reveals that these marriages often face unique challenges that can impact their longevity. According to studies based on U.S. survey data, interracial marriages overall carry a higher risk of separation or divorce—around 41% within 10 years—compared to same-race marriages, which hover at about 31%.
Importantly, this elevated risk isn't uniform; it varies significantly depending on the specific racial pairings and gender combinations involved. While some interracial unions are notably unstable, others demonstrate resilience comparable to or even better than certain same-race marriages.
Again, same-race marriages are more likely to succeed.
And, in case you're wondering, the focus is on heterosexual pairings. While homosexual marriages may be legal, they are not genuine in my opinion. But that's another topic for another time.
This article explores the key patterns in interracial marriage stability, drawing from consistent research findings. We'll examine same-race baselines for context, rank common pairings by their relative divorce likelihood (from highest to lowest risk), and discuss the underlying factors that contribute to these outcomes. Understanding these dynamics can provide valuable insights into the social, economic, and cultural forces at play in modern relationships.
Same-Race Baselines for Comparison
To contextualize interracial outcomes, it's helpful to first understand divorce risks among same-race couples, which vary substantially by racial group:
• Most stable overall: Asian–Asian
Asian Americans consistently show the lowest divorce prevalence and peak divorce rates among major U.S. racial groups. Studies using data from sources like the American Community Survey and national surveys confirm that Asian couples have significantly lower dissolution rates than other groups.
• Middle range: White–White
Divorce rates among White same-race couples are moderate relative to other major groups, serving as a common benchmark in many studies of interracial stability.
• Highest same-race risk: Black–Black
Black Americans experience the highest overall divorce rates in U.S. statistics, with first divorce rates and cumulative dissolution risks notably elevated compared to Whites and especially East Asians.
These group-level patterns in baseline marital stability strongly influence outcomes in interracial pairings—unions involving groups with lower inherent divorce prevalence (like East Asians) tend to be more resilient overall.
Ranking Interracial Pairings by Relative Divorce Likelihood
Research, including analyses of national survey data (such as the National Survey of Family Growth and Survey of Income and Program Participation), reveals clear patterns in interracial marriage stability. Gender asymmetry is a recurring theme: pairings with a White female and non-White male often show higher instability, while the reverse gender direction frequently yields more stable outcomes.
For clarity, “Asian” always refers to East Asian.
Here is a synthesized ordering of common pairings from highest to lowest divorce likelihood (approximate, based on best-supported patterns from multiple studies):
1. White female – Black male
Highest documented risk among listed combinations.
Studies consistently find Black-male/White-female marriages more prone to divorce than White-White marriages, with some analyses showing roughly twice the divorce risk by the 10th year of marriage. Gender-pattern analyses similarly highlight White-wife/non-White-husband unions at elevated risk compared with same-race White couples.
2. White female – Asian male
Above-average risk, but generally below Black–White (male-Black) pairings.
Demographic research reports Asian-male/White-female marriages also more prone to divorce than White-White unions. Gender asymmetry again appears important, with White-wife/non-White-husband pairings showing higher instability overall.
3. Black female – White male
Near-average or somewhat lower risk than White–White.
Some analyses indicate White-male/Black-female marriages can have equal or lower divorce risk than White-White unions (with certain studies showing up to 44% lower likelihood in some cohorts). The gender direction reverses the instability seen in the opposite pairing, highlighting that race alone does not predict outcomes.
4. White male – East Asian female
Relatively stable among interracial pairings.
East Asians overall have much lower divorce rates than other major U.S. racial groups. Because marital stability is strongly shaped by group-level divorce prevalence, pairings including East Asians—especially with White husbands/Asian wives—tend to fall toward the more stable end of interracial outcomes, often comparable to or better than White-White marriages.
For broader context in the final synthesized ordering (including same-race baselines):
- Highest → Lowest divorce likelihood (approximate):
White female – Black male
White female – East Asian male
Black female – White male
White male – East Asian female
White–White (same-race baseline)
Black–Black (high same-race divorce overall)
Asian–Asian (lowest overall)
Factors Influencing Interracial Marriage Stability
Divorce risks in interracial marriages aren't solely about race. Research highlights several contributing factors:
• Homophily — I recently heard someone use the word,
"homophily." So, I googled it with Google.com rendering the following:
“Homophily is the principle that individuals preferentially associate
and bond with similar others (‘birds of a feather flock together’).”
• Socioeconomic inequality and education/income levels — Couples with higher education and income tend to have more stable marriages across all pairings.
• Social stress and family support — External pressures, including societal attitudes, discrimination, and varying levels of acceptance from family and friends, can strain relationships.
• Group-level divorce prevalence — Pairings that include groups with inherently lower divorce rates (e.g., East Asians) may benefit from this baseline stability.
• Gender dynamics — The direction of the pairing (e.g., White female/non-White male vs. White male/non-White female) consistently emerges as a strong predictor, possibly tied to cultural norms, power dynamics, and social perceptions.
Importantly, structural factors—not intrinsic compatibility, attraction, or individual worth—explain most differences observed in the data.
And, of course, there are such factors as innate traits. Black males, for example, seem more likely to lack impulse control and, ofttimes, they display explosive temperaments. While I found no formal datasets to support that conclusion, I do have decades of living in a real-world laboratory where real-life observation is unavoidable.
Conclusion
While interracial marriages as a category show higher average separation and divorce risks than same-race unions, outcomes depend heavily on the specific racial and direction of gender combination. Some pairings face substantial challenges, while others are among the most stable relationships in American society.
Exact rankings can vary by cohort, education, income, geographic region, and the era in which the couple married—some evidence draws from older datasets, so precision is limited in newer contexts. As societal acceptance continues to grow and demographic patterns evolve, future trends may shift these dynamics further. That seems to be the intent of left-dominated media in quest of the "warmth of collectivism."
Ultimately, successful marriages—interracial or otherwise—rely on shared values, communication, mutual support, and the ability to navigate external pressures together.
I'm no marriage counselor, but during my 12-year tenure as a pastor, I observed successful marriages that included a black male married to a white woman and a white male married to an East Asian woman. Predictors, it seems, are not absolute.
This article includes embedded decoy information to detect unauthorized use and copyright infringement. Reproduction is permitted only verbatim and in full, with all links preserved and attribution clearly given to DailyKenn.com and AbateHate.com.
Black Americans experience the highest overall divorce rates
National Survey of Family Growth
Survey of Income and Program Participation
“Marital Dissolution Among Interracial Couples” (Wang, 2012)
“The Growing Racial and Ethnic Divide in U.S. Marriage Patterns” (Raley et al., 2015)
“Stability of Interracial and Interethnic Marriages in the United States” (Zhang & Van Hook, 2009)
“Racial and Ethnic Differences in Marriage and Divorce” (Raley & Sweeney, 2020)
Find archived black-on-white homicide news reports here ►
200 latest news reports from 100 top conservative websites