DailyKenn.com | AbateHate.com | New Facebook Group
David first saw Stockholm at dusk in late October, and the city looked like a postcard someone had left in the rain. Golden light smeared across the water, ferries cut silent wakes, and every third person on the tram wore a scarf the color of fresh snow. He was twenty-nine, clutching a grant to study “Nordic happiness,” convinced he had found the future.
Your $8 monthly partner pledge helps us reach others & more ►
His guide was a tax inspector named Lars, tall, quiet, the kind of man who apologized when someone stepped on his foot. Lars met him outside Centralstation with two paper cups of coffee so strong it could wake the dead.
“You want the real Sweden?” Lars asked. “Follow the money.”
They started in the archives of the Riksbank, where the air smelled of old paper and older ambition. Lars pulled a folder labeled Krisåren. Inside: yellowed clippings, a photo of Prime Minister Olof Palme grinning beside a headline that read “67% of GDP, World Record!”
“That was us,” Lars said. “We taxed, we spent, we promised the moon. And for a minute, it worked.” From 1950 to 1970 Sweden rocketed from war-torn neutrality to the fourth-richest nation on Earth (Maddison Project, 2020). Cradle-to-grave security. Six weeks of vacation. A hospital bed for every citizen who sneezed. But the numbers lied. Behind the welfare curtain factories slowed. Entrepreneurs packed for Switzerland. By 1993 the country was 17th in GDP per capita and staring into a banking abyss. Lars tapped the photo. “This smile? It cost us a decade.”
David met Astrid in a dimly lit apartment in Södermalm. She was seventy-eight, a retired nurse, and still furious. “I waited eleven weeks for cancer surgery,” she said, pouring aquavit into thimble-sized glasses. “Eleven. My neighbor paid cash for a clinic in Denmark. I sat in the queue like a good socialist.” Her story wasn’t rare. By 2023 the average wait for cancer treatment had crept back to ten weeks (Swedish National Board of Health). One in three Swedes now bought private insurance just to jump the line (Svenskt Näringsliv, 2022). Astrid raised her glass. “To universal healthcare,” she toasted, voice dripping acid. “May it die before I do.”
The savior came wearing a pinstripe suit and a guilty conscience. His name was Carl Bildt, a conservative prime minister in a country that hated conservatives. He slashed corporate taxes, privatized telecoms, and, most heretical of all, introduced school vouchers. Suddenly parents could send kids to any school, public or private. The teachers’ union howled. The PISA scores stopped falling (Böhlmark & Lindahl, 2015). Lars showed David the data on his phone while they waited for a ferry. “Look,” Lars said, zooming in. “The bigger the welfare state got, the worse the kids did. The second we let markets in? Boom.” David asked what happened to the socialists. “They rebranded,” Lars laughed. “Now they call it choice within the system.”
They took a train south to Malmö, where the future was already arriving in the form of parallel societies. In Rosengård Arabic signs outnumbered Swedish ones. Unemployment among non-EU migrants hovered at 25 points above natives (SCB, 2024). A Syrian engineer named Rami drove them past shuttered shops. “I have a master’s,” Rami said. “But the unions price me out. So I drive Uber. The state pays my rent. Everyone loses.” Back in Stockholm the Pensions Agency had just released its Orange Report, a polite Swedish way of saying they were screwed. By 2035 there would be 80 retirees for every 100 workers. The system was short 15–20% of GDP (Swedish Pensions Agency, 2023). Lars lit a cigarette on the balcony of his office, overlooking the Riksdag. “We imported labor to pay for the elderly. But the labor doesn’t work. And the elderly keep living.” He exhaled smoke into the cold. “It’s a Ponzi scheme with better furniture.”
IKEA’s Ingvar Kamprad had lived in exile for thirty-three years, fleeing a wealth tax that treated success like a crime. When Sweden scrapped it in 2007 he returned. So did the Tetra Pak Raussings. Suddenly unicorns sprouted, Spotify, Klarna, Mojang. But the party was short. Personal taxes stayed sky-high (57% at the margin, KPMG 2024), and the next generation of founders looked to Tallinn, not Stockholm. At a startup pitch night in a converted church a twenty-six-year-old named Elin told David, “I love Sweden. But I’ll incorporate in Estonia. Here the state is my co-founder, and it takes 60%.”
Last stop: a kindergarten in Solna. Kids napped under wool blankets while teachers whispered about sick leave. Sweden logged the highest sick days in the EU, some real, some cultural (Hartman, 2019). One teacher, Hanna, shrugged. “If you’re stressed, you stay home. The system pays. Who’s the fool?” Outside the sun finally broke through. The city sparkled again, clean, safe, equal. But David remembered Astrid’s aquavit toast. He remembered Rami’s empty engineering degree. He remembered the Orange Report’s ticking clock. Lars walked him to the airport. “You came for the fairy tale,” Lars said. “But fairy tales have dragons.” Lars handed David a final gift: a faded bumper sticker from 1994. It read, in blocky Swedish: “Marknad, inte mandat.” Markets, not mandates. David kept it in his wallet all the way home.
Sources: Maddison Project (2020); Jonung, L. (2008), Sveriges Riksbank Economic Review; Lapidus, J. (2020), Health Policy; Böhlmark & Lindahl (2015), The Economic Journal; Swedish Pensions Agency (2023), Orange Report; Ruist, J. (2021), European Economic Review; Henrekson & Sanandaji (2018), IFN Working Paper; Hartman, L. (2019), IZA World of Labor; Sanandaji, T. (2020), Mass Challenge.
Postscript: Lars still sends David postcards. The latest reads, “Winter’s coming. So is the reckoning.”
Well—no, he doesn’t actually send postcards. David and Lars are fictional, even though the issues behind their story are not. Instead of presenting a straightforward article filled with facts and figures, I chose to wrap the information in a narrative to make it more engaging.
Fact: Research shows that narrative framing can improve reader engagement and retention compared to strictly expository formats.
Source: Harvard Business Review – “The Irresistible Power of Storytelling as a Strategic Business Tool”
https://hbr.org/2014/03/the-irresistible-power-of-storytelling-as-a-strategic-business-tool
Here’s the outline:
Key Arguments Against Sweden’s Democratic Socialism
High Taxes Undermine Growth and Incentives
Sweden’s welfare state is funded by very high tax burdens. According to critics, steep marginal income taxes, heavy payroll taxes, and a high value‑added tax create disincentives for work, saving, and investment. The Heritage Foundation+2Cato Institute+2
The IMF has noted that extensive state intervention can lead to inefficiencies, particularly when government roles crowd out private sector dynamism. IMF
According to a Cato Institute analysis, after a certain point, Sweden’s high taxes and government spending may have hampered its industrial competitiveness. Cato Institute
Welfare State Sustainability Is Fragile
The “political economy of success” in Sweden relied on a broad social consensus; but sustaining such a system requires constant political will and large fiscal resources. Lane Kenworthy
According to more recent OECD analysis, reducing labor tax wedges (i.e., lowering the tax burden on work) could improve labor-market incentives. OECD
The high cost of pensions and aging demographics put increasing pressure on public finances, which could threaten welfare provisions in the future.
Economic Crisis Vulnerability
Sweden experienced a significant banking and fiscal crisis in the early 1990s. Critics argue that this was partially caused by the over-expansion of its welfare system, which led to capital flight, reduced competitiveness, and macroeconomic instability. The Heritage Foundation+2Cato Institute+2
The “Swedish disease,” as some call it, refers to how high taxes and generous benefits can discourage entrepreneurship and risk‑taking. The Washington Post
Labor Market Distortions and Rigidity
High job security for permanent workers combined with rigid regulations created a two-tier labor market in Sweden: very secure jobs on one side, very precarious ones (temporary contracts) on the other. Institutet för Näringslivsforskning
Such dualism can disadvantage marginalized groups (e.g., young people, immigrants), limiting their job opportunities and contributing to inequality. Institutet för Näringslivsforskning
Growing Inequality Despite the Welfare State
According to recent OECD data, income inequality in Sweden (measured by disposable income) has increased, driven in part by capital gains. OECD
There is also criticism that the wealthy in Sweden benefit disproportionately from low capital taxes. For example, despite a high-tax narrative, wealth accumulation has not been fully curtailed. Financial Times
From a left-wing perspective, some argue that the Social Democratic Party has “abandoned the working class”: real wage growth has stagnated for certain groups, and temporary employment has risen particularly among working-class Swedes. Jacobin
Public Sector Inefficiencies and Lack of Innovation
Large public sectors can become bureaucratic, inflexible, and less cost-conscious. Economic historians and political economists argue that Sweden’s public sector, especially in earlier decades, lacked responsiveness to individual preferences and was slow to reform. Institutet för Näringslivsforskning
Excessive regulation and red tape can suppress entrepreneurial activity and innovation. Private firms may find themselves burdened by compliance costs, reducing their ability to be competitive globally.
Misconception: It’s Not “Pure Socialism”
A common point of critique is that many people mischaracterize Sweden as “socialist,” when in fact its economy remains deeply market‑oriented and capitalist. Realities of Socialism+1
According to research by Nima Sanandaji (“Scandinavian Unexceptionalism”), much of Sweden’s success comes from cultural norms, strong institutions, and market mechanisms—not just welfare spending. In other words, prosperity persists despite democratic socialism, not because of it. Wikipedia
Political Rigidity and Moral Hazard
Once generous welfare benefits are entrenched, cutting them becomes politically difficult, even during economic downturns. This can lead to “political sclerosis,” where welfare promises constrain policy responses. The Washington Post
There is a risk of creating dependency: when benefits are generous, individuals might reduce their labor participation or become less entrepreneurial, knowing that the state provides a strong safety net.
Migrants originating from culturally burdensome societies
Certain ethnic groups, on average, exhibit lower intelligence and innate moral standards, disproportionately burdening the economy through reliance on social welfare programs without commensurate contributions.
 |
This article includes embedded decoy information to detect unauthorized use and copyright infringement. Reproduction is permitted only verbatim and in full, with all links preserved and attribution clearly given to DailyKenn.com and AbateHate.com.
Your $8 monthly partner pledge helps us reach others & more ►
Find archived black-on-white homicide news reports here ►
200 latest news reports from 100 top conservative websites